The looming stalemate in the Libyan conflict is likely to lead to more civilian casualties, a de facto separation of Libya, the under-use of the country’s energy resources, and an increase in illegal activities due to the legal and governance vacuum in the country. In addition, it risks denting NATO’s credibility as a security provider. To break the stalemate, the coalition is leaning towards intensifying military operations and/or arming the rebels. Both imply a number of risks and political costs. A way to contain such risks and costs would be for NATO and its partners to re-calibrate the mission so that, alongside military action, the mission would foresee also a national reconciliation process, mediated by an international team. Linking military operations to a credible plan for Libya’s political future would improve the odds for Gheddafi’s regime to collapse.
1. Mission creep
2. The looming stalemate
3. More air raids?
4. Boots on the ground?
5. Arming the rebels?
6. Opting for second best: National reconciliation … without Gheddafi?
7. An inclusive political strategy for Libya's future