This EU IDEA paper engages with ideational origins and normative political theories of European differentiated integration. Specifically, it examines a “graduated” policy of integration backed by European-wide referenda in light of the work of Jürgen Habermas and Hannah Arendt – two theorists who are strong advocates of European political integration and constitutionalisation. The paper illuminates justifications, advantages, dilemmas and problems of such differentiated integration with regard to its democratic legitimacy and normative as well as political-theoretical plausibility. While Habermas has proposed and refined this model, Arendt’s radically pro-European ideas can work as a cautioning corrective alerting to the risks and potentially disintegrating effects of differentiated solidarity and integration on the European project. While she would arguably see the democratic legitimation benefits of a European-wide constitutional referendum as suggested by Habermas, her work also points to the risks of further fragmenting or even dismantling the EU altogether.
1. Introduction: Rethinking European politics in a time of crisis
2. A dual-track EU anchored in democratic deliberation and public will-formation? Habermas’ rationale for “graduated” European integration
2.1 The EU and the post-national constellation in the twenty-first century: Diagnosing globalised dilemmas, crises and challenges
2.2 Europe, faltering from the inside? On “home-made” political problems and self-inflicted failures of the project of European democratic integration
2.3 Engaging and emboldening a European demos? Habermas and a policy of graduated integration
3. Differentiation as disintegration? Problematising graduated integration with Hannah Arendt
4. Debating Arendt and Habermas: Normative and policy implications
5. Conclusion: Does differentiated integration mean European Disintegration or a step towards a European demos?