Vol. XLI,
No. 4
October - December 2006Editorial Note
Essays
Conflict and Reform in Eastern Europe
Domestic Politics and European Integration in Ukraine
Kataryna Wolczuk
The Orange Revolution in 2004
introduced a new dynamic into Ukraine's relations with the EU but has not led to the
breakthrough in relations that had been hoped for in Ukraine. The main focus of relations,
under the auspices of the European Neighbourhood Policy, is the jointly agreed Action Plan
(AP), which lists objectives that Ukraine is required to implement to deepen its
integration with the EU. However, the Ukrainian authorities have found it difficult to
close the gap between rhetoric and deeds. European integration - although supported by all
key political actors - has not yet become a priority for most of them. Even though, unlike
integration with NATO, European integration is not openly contested in Ukraine,
implementation of the AP remains hostage to vested political and economic interests and
administrative bottlenecks. And yet, the ENP is making a difference in Ukraine. For the
very first time in Ukraine-EU relations, the AP has provided much needed guidelines and a
focus for domestic policymaking in Ukraine. Ukrainians have been keen to seize the
opportunity provided by the ENP to prove themselves "good pupils" vis-à-vis
the EU in the hope of moving closer to a membership perspective.
Ukrainian Foreign and Security Policy Since the Orange Revolution
Taras Kuzio
President Yushchenko is focused on
adopting reforms that should allow Ukraine to move forward with integration in the most
important Western institutions. NATO and EU membership, especially, have been Ukraine's
strategic goals since 1998 and 2002, but Yushchenko is more clearly ideologically driven
towards these goals than his predecessors. However, Ukraine is still a divided country:
one part would like to integrate more with the CIS, the other would like to integrate with
the West. Support in the Parliament for NATO membership is still ambiguous; only two
political parties are clearly oriented toward that goal, while other parties (including
Premier Yanukovych's Party of Regions) seems to be less committed. Popular support for
NATO membership, moreover, is generally low. Support for EU membership is higher, but
relations with the EU are complicated by the European Union's enlargement fatigue and the
EU's tendency to be complacent and passive towards Ukraine membership.
EU Initiatives for Border Management in its Eastern
Neighbourhood
Oleksandr Sushko
The EU, given its experience in
multilateral border management, can provide useful assistance to help eastern neighbours
solve their border problems. The EU is currently involved in Transnistria, Ukraine and
Moldova with policies and initiatives. A good example of this is the EU Border Assistance
Mission (Eubam), an advisory body whose goal is to assist Ukraine and Moldova to harmonise
their border management standards, improve risk analysis capacities and cooperation
between different law enforcement agencies. Eubam has already achieved an improvement of
security conditions on the ground. Another example of EU border-related policy in the area
is the new Ukraine-Moldova customs regime, introduced with pressure from the EU, which
increased transparency of import-export flows to and from Ukraine, Moldova and
Transnistria. The EU involvement in border-related and regional problems, with a firm
political stance based on European values, mediation and technical and financial
assistance, can thus lead to a positive outcome.
Peacekeeping in Transnistria: Cooperation or Competition?
Dov Linch
The so-called "frozen
conflict" between Moldova and the breakaway Moldovan territory of Transnistria is of
increasing strategic interest for the EU. In the last 15 years the separatist authorities
of Transnistria managed to strengthen their position by acquiring features of statehood.
They also strengthened their armed forces and militarised the conflict zone. Transnistrian
leaders still aim to negotiate their exit from the Moldovan state, while Moldova's goal is
to reach a compromise that would retain the area within Moldova proper. Prospects for a
settlement are not rosy. The EU could seek to relaunch negotiations between the parties by
providing a new negotiation mechanism, placing additional pressure on Transnistria while
strengthening Moldova, and improving EU-Russia cooperation.
EU Neglect and Competing Mediation in Georgia's Conflicts
Nathalie Tocci
This article analyses another
"frozen conflict" hub in the former Soviet space, namely Georgia's conflicts
with Abkhazia and South Ossetia, focussing on the EU's impact on these two conflicts. As
in the case of Transnistria, Georgia's conflicts have been afflicted by a paradoxical mix
of international neglect, and competing mediation by Russia, the US and international
organisations. The EU plays a minimal role in the South Caucasus, and as such it could not
have fundamentally influenced conflict resolution in the region. Yet despite its loose
contractual ties with Georgia and its modest levels of aid to the region, the EU's
peacemaking potential has not been fully met. Beyond an insufficient degree of
involvement, the EU has self-constrained its actions due to its insufficient interest in
the region on the one hand, and its deference to Russia on the other.
Europe Forum
Beefing up the ENP: Towards a Modernisation and Stability
Partnership
Barbara Lippert
This article presents a new framework
for aligning neighbouring countries with the EU below the level of membership by proposing
to develop a new type of association agreement for modernisation and stabilisation. This
general framework would be tailor-made for those Eastern European neighbours which, in
principle, have the option to apply for membership. Moreover, it is argued that the EU
should engage in an overarching institution alongside the European Union. To this end the
EU should establish a confederation of tasks to be built together with countries that
share a European vocation but are not members of the EU.
Opinions
Diplomatic Opportunities After the Israeli-Hezbollah
Conflict
Roberto Aliboni
Upon Iranian and Shiite initiative, a
widespread anti-Western front is currently emerging in the Middle East. This is the result
of the mistaken US-led intervention in Iraq. To deal with this development, the West
should opt for strategies based on political and diplomatic instruments while dropping
those based on military force and coercion. The cease-fire in Lebanon after the
Israeli-Lebanese conflict of the summer 2006 and the UN intervention offer a favourable
opportunity for undertaking the change in strategy and for starting a new diplomacy in the
Middle East: the European intervention in support of the Israeli-Lebanese cease-fire may
work as a window of opportunity for starting a diplomatic cycle aimed at stabilising,
initially, the Levant and, then, the Middle East and doing it in a perspective of restored
transatlantic solidarity.
Book Review and Notes
Time to Talk
More Georgia, Less Russia
Anna Matveeva
IAI Library Notes
Alessandra Bertino and Maritza Cricorian
Index 2006
List of
Contributors 2006