Vol. XXXIX,
No. 2
April - June 2004Editorial Note
Europe Forum
The Democratic Accountability of the EU
and the Role of the European Parliament
The European Parliament and the Dilemmas of European Integration
Brendan Donnelly
Over the past twenty five years, the European Parliament has been an energetic advocate
and effective promoter of European integration. This active role of the EP is, however,
now constrained by the current clash within the European Union of differing visions for
the Union's development. The clash is apparent in the ambiguous recommendations of the
European Constitution on the role of the European and national parliaments. The European
Parliament needs and most of its members want this debate to be resolved in favour of a
European Union with strong and autonomous central institutions. But its capacity to
influence the actual outcome of the debate is limited.
European Political Parties: A (Timidly) Rising Actor in the EU Political System
Luciano Bardi
Despite three main European level party structures - national parties, EP groups and
transnational federations - intergovernmentalism still prevails over supranationalism, in
that national parties are much more effective through intergovernmental decision-making
than EP parliamentary groups or transnational federations. The rather positive potential
of parliamentary groups revealed by studies is hardly brought to fruition because of the
weakness of their links to civil society. This has had a negative effect on the growth of
real Europarties, on the effectiveness of the EP and on the democratic quality of the EU
system. Changes will or could ensue from three recent developments: the European
Constitution, EU enlargement and the statute for European political parties. In
particular, the latters provisions could consolidate the various party components
operating at the European level.
The European Parliament in CFSP: More than a Marginal
Player?
Udo Diedrichs
Over the years, the European Parliament has skillfully used its limited powers in Common
Foreign and Security Policy (CFSP) to increase its influence. Particularly in the
budgetary field, the EP has an important say and, in the area of Security and Defence
Policy (ESDP), it can shape civilian crisis management decisions. The conclusion of the
Constitutional Treaty will probably not dramatically increase the EPs powers, but it
could provide impulse for further development of the EPs role and functions, thereby
enhancing accountability. In particular, relations with the future EU Foreign Minister
will be crucial for defining Parliament's influence on CFSP. The EP should also try to
establish itself as a public arena for debate of foreign and security issues within the
European Union, in order to gain a higher profile in that field.
The Evolution of CFSP Institutions: Where does Democratic
Accountability Stand?
Esther Barbé
The tendency to "cross-pillarise" EU security and defence aspects, together with
the "mushrooming" of new security and defence institutions that are asymmetric
in terms of membership and competences contribute to blurring the delimitation of
responsibilities on security and defence issues. Consecutive reforms of CFSP institutions
have been based on the principles of coherence, visibility and continuity and have not
improved accountability. Despite the new figures of an elected President of the European
Council and a European Foreign Minister, introduced with the Constitution, CFSP and
especially ESDP have gone in the direction of further decentralisation of institutional
structures and the creation of new flexibility instruments. These changes may make
European foreign and defence policy more efficient, but they also pose challenges to the
accountability dimension as they could cause greater fragmentation and less transparency.
Opinions
Not so Far Apart - Societal Change and its Impact on Transatlantic Relations
Cesare Merlini
Three dimensions of societal change - religion, demographic trends and immigration - are
frequently cited as demonstrating a growing difference between Europe and the United
States. Although these factors have their impact, society in the West - on both sides of
the Atlantic - is moving steadily in the direction of growing communication and
interdependence within the framework of a still detectable basic trend towards
secularisation and the institutionalisation of social behaviours and relations. Two other
equally important instances of societal change (the role of women in society and the
advent of the Internet) are clearly bringing the US and Europe - and the rest of the world
- together. Thus, if there is the perception of a faltering convergence between the United
States and Europe, this is the result of the policy choices of governments, not of US and
European societies drifting apart.
Essays
The Middle East Policy of the Holy See
Silvio Ferrari
In addition to protecting Jerusalem and the holy sites, Vatican policy in the Middle East
is aimed at the permanence of a large and vital Christian community in the Middle East,
also as a pendant to the Muslim presence in Europe and a factor of equilibrium
for the entire Mediterranean area. Radical transformations have thrown this strategy into
crisis: the rise of Islamic radicalism has reopened the spectre of discrimination against
(if not persecution of ) Christians, striking to the heart of the Popes Middle East
strategy, aimed at reconstructing a climate of dialogue and reconciliation between Jews,
Christians and Muslims. In fuelling Islamic terrorism, it has triggered the intervention
of the United States in the area, opposed not only because the Holy See wants US
leadership to be framed in a precise system of international law guaranteed by the United
Nations, but also because it fears that the Arab public could confuse the Catholic Church
with the West as a whole and that such an identification could lead to the war being
interpreted as a clash of civilisations or, worse, a conflict between
Christianity and Islam - a danger that the Holy See wants to avoid at all cost.
Riding on the Winds of Change: The Future of the Euro-Mediterranean Partnership
Tobias Schumacher
In consideration of the EMPs poor track record, a general revision of the Barcelona
Process is highly warranted. Priority areas for action include differentiated cooperation
and positive conditionality, co-ownership and co-financing of programmes. The first basket
of EMP, which includes security, must be revitalized as it has the potential to facilitate
the adoption of common views on security in the Mediterranean area, enhance mutual trust
and understanding for the partners security concerns and, ideally, lead to a common
security language. The EU will have to consider redefining the EMPs
geographic scope, transforming it into a more inclusive and flexible Euro-Middle East
Partnership (EMEP) and redesigning it into an intergovernmental framework with the EMP at
its centre and several bi- and/or multilateral inter-, intra- and sub-regional cooperation
clusters around it.
Towards a European Space Policy?
Simonetta Cheli and Jean-Pierre Darnis
The growth of European space programs and their security dimension calls for a reflection.
Different actors, mainly the EU and the European Space Agency, are acquiring a major role
in space technologies. This development is determining a "program-driven" space
policy logic, with important implications for European security. Analysis of the different
trends is required to contribute to the emergence of a European Space Strategy concept.
Book Reviews and Notes
IAI Library Notes
Maritza Cricorian